Michael Turton linked to a recent editorial in the
The only way this huff can be considered excellent is as an example of a comically unhinged Taipei Times editorial. It’s touchingly naïve, risibly stupid, and quite gargantuanly soppy, arrogant and pompous. It says a lot about the
Time for a fisking.
Let's face it: Despite its best diplomatic efforts and a just cause,
Strive as it might, no amount of moral suasion is likely to change anything at the UN or in the ivory tower of global diplomacy. For when it comes to making a place for Taiwan, what is required most on the part of those who would grant Taiwan that recognition is imagination -- and how precious little there is of that at the UN and in the foreign ministries of this world.
The sage introduces his focus word – the pricelessly naïve “imagination” (“Hey dude, if only these guys had imagination man…if only they could imagine what it’s like to be Taiwanese… ”). I think the truth is closer to “For when it comes to making a place for Taiwan, what is required most on the part of those who would grant Taiwan that recognition is an overwhelming desire to tell China to go sit and swivel -- and how precious little there is of that at the UN and in the foreign ministries of this world.”
Nothing better exemplifies this than the customs officer in an otherwise vibrant democracy who, upon perusing a foreigner's passport, asks him how long he has lived in
As he expands on his blog, he’s recounting his own degrading experience. I have also encountered a customs officer in an otherwise vibrant democracy (
Remember the hilarious debacle when Hu jintao visited
Maybe it’s just me, but the visa seems pretty unambiguous. REPUBLIC OF
The freedom fighter isn't going to let a slur like that one slide though. He’s got an indignant response to the effect that he has lived in Taiwan ….and for nearly two years! If, as he sagely advises fellow travellers further down he actually “express[ed his] outrage” I think that customs officer played a shrugging role in the unfolding of a tantrum. May well have been the highlight of his day. Short of correcting himself by saying “Republic of China” what else was he supposed to do?
This calls for a shift in approach, a brand awareness campaign that starts from the bottom up rather than the top down and focuses on a different customer -- people.
Forget letters to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon or missives to the General Assembly, as they are so beholden to narrow interests as to make them incapable of summoning the imagination that is required to address the problem.
But much work needs to be done to make this new strategy effective, for as every expatriate who has lived in Taiwan can testify, people back home know precious little about it. Ask anyone to locate
Yes. A bottom up brand awareness campaign – aimed at people.
Bollocks to letters and missives, let’s head straight for the John Lennon fans. It’s gonna be tough though – after all, what’s imagination without knowledge?
Now my fellow non-Taiwanese from across the globe, let’s all hold hands, close our eyes and imagine - if we can – what it must be like to be Taiwanese. Let’s try and share their pain, feel their fate. If you belong to the 9/10ths of humanity economically worse off, or the half not entitled to vote, or the almost everyone who has to live under a worse health system, do not feel envy – feel their suffering – for unlike you privileged ones they are not represented at the UN! Shush, Dr Ron Paul, not a word!
This dearth of imagination, in turn, is the worst enemy of a people, as it does not allow for the emotional bond that compels individuals -- and in turn governments -- to act for the sake of someone else. Such a lack allows for all types of transgressions to be visited upon people, from genocide in
Yup, just slips off the tongue doesn’t it.
So what can be done? One secret weapon, perhaps, lies in the expatriates who live in
Aha, a secret weapon! Take that
J. Michael Cole for one is certainly not put off. He knows that any inconvenience he suffers will be minor compared with what Taiwanese would have to endure should they democratically disagree with his nearly two years of hands on experience.
It is no coincidence that courses on how to react in hostage-taking situations teach participants to show pictures of their spouses and children so that an emotional bond can be created with their captors. By giving himself a face, a history, the captive is making it more difficult for the hostage-taker to treat him as a faceless individual who can be subjected to violence, or someone whose fate can be ignored.
Friends of
Go show the third world. I’m sure they’ll be very receptive once they start imagining.
Taiwan is significantly more independent than any EU state.
Friends of Taiwan should realise that nation states really don't mean very much in the 21st century.
9 comments:
Ben, I think you've blown things a little out of proportion. Sure, it's not the most interesting article, but I don't think there's anything wrong with saying that Taiwan would do better by encouraging more westerners to come live here and be "ambassadors." I know that most people back home where I'm from had no idea where Taiwan was or its relationship with China, but just through my coming and talking to them about it, they've become more aware of what's happening here.
That's all I felt this guy was trying to say, although in a not so eloquent manner.
I think Taiwan has too many expat ambassadors, and most on the line of 'Taiwan is xxx because my Taiwanese girlfriend says xxx, so it must be so'.
The guy you're shredding here removed your comment on his blog.
You're dead right, Robo.
All he's doing is saying that foreigners who live in and love Taiwan can do their bit to correct some of the ignorance out there in the world.
What is wrong with that?
It's so easy to be sarcastic and criticise other people's work.
This was an editorial from the Taipei Times - probably Taiwan's leading English language newspaper. It deserved to be ridiculed.
If it were just a blog entry, Rob & heishoudang, I'd agree.
Well, Ben, I don't know what to say. The author is a wise and experienced person who knows what he is saying and why. I too have often thought more imagination is the answer to lots of public policy problems.
You might consider rewriting this post, and removing the personal comments. The author is someone you are likely to meet and someone I know to be a gentleman and a scholar. He's on the right side, even if you think he is going about it the wrong way. You might also consider an apology -- believe me, I have apologized for much worse stuff than this. It's a hazard of posting that one's net persona tends to be much worse than one's real one.
Michael
Your thoughts are appreciated, Michael.
I've made minor alterations to a couple of previous posts - but then realised I'd been disengenuous to the people who had commented. I therefore feel that I can't now alter the piece.
I do somewhat regret the tone (but not the content) of my post and have hopefully learned something.
I also think that someone who writes editorials for the Taipei Times has to expect - and learn from - criticism. That is a hazard of writing editorials.
I hope M. J. Cole has a thick enough skin to see past my net persona.
Robo, I think the one who "blew things out of proportion" is writer of the editorial who compared Taiwan not being able to enter the UN or WHO to the genocide in Rwanda and ethnic cleansing in Sudan.
Assuming Ben's comment on his blog wasn't profane or off-topic, deleting it seems like a bit of an over-reaction.
Prince Roy, I agree completely. Why it is that every third foreigner here wants to be an "ambassador for Taiwan" is beyond me. It seems arrogant to think that just living here a few years makes you a representative of all the millions of people here. Why not let your Taiwanese girlfriend be the one to tell them what Taiwan is like?
"So what can be done? One secret weapon, perhaps, lies in the expatriates who live in Taiwan who have come to know and love its people and appreciate its democratic accomplishments, and who wish for it to succeed. All can mobilize to act as ambassadors."
If they are a secret weapon, Taiwan has yet to realize them. Actually, Taiwan does a pretty good job of pissing off its so-called ambassadors. Look at Taiwan's messed up visa policies, the difficulties the ambassadors have in procuring them and renewing them, and then compare these policies to those of China, other Asian countries or just about any place in the world. Look at how hard it is for the ambassadors to immigrate here. (The last time I checked the figures, 11 Americans had successfully become naturalized Taiwanese while every year in the States, 10,000 Taiwanese become citizens.)
On the ambassadors "appreciating its democratic accomplishments", I just have one question: when was the last time any of these expat ambassadors actually voted in Taiwan?
Why don't the ambassadors wake up? Taiwan does not really want them.
Post a Comment